4.8 Article

Greenhouse warming and the 21st century hydroclimate of southwestern North America

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0910856107

关键词

climate change; decadal variability; hydrological cycle; southwest drying; drought

资金

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NA08OAR4320912]
  2. National Science Foundation [ATM08-04107]
  3. Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory
  4. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [0804107] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate models robustly predict that the climate of southwestern North America, defined as the area from the western Great Plains to the Pacific Ocean and from the Oregon border to southern Mexico, will dry throughout the current century as a consequence of rising greenhouse gases. This regional drying is part of a general drying of the subtropics and poleward expansion of the subtropical dry zones. Through an analysis of 15 coupled climate models it is shown here that the drying is driven by a reduction of winter season precipitation associated with increased moisture divergence by the mean flow and reduced moisture convergence by transient eddies. Due to the presence of large amplitude decadal variations of presumed natural origin, observations to date cannot confirm that this transition to a drier climate is already underway, but it is anticipated that the anthropogenic drying will reach the amplitude of natural decadal variability by midcentury. In addition to this drop in total precipitation, warming is already causing a decline in mountain snow mass and an advance in the timing of spring snow melt disrupting the natural water storage systems that are part of the region's water supply system. Uncertainties in how radiative forcing will impact the tropical Pacific climate system create uncertainties in the amplitude of drying in southwest North America with a La Nina-like response creating a worst case scenario of greater drying.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据