4.8 Article

Vitamin K epoxide reductase prefers ER membrane-anchored thioredoxin-like redox partners

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009972107

关键词

disulfide bond formation; warfarin; quinone; blood coagulation; electron transfer

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [T32GM07753]
  2. Charles King Trust
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH) [1K99HL097083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKOR) sustains blood coagulation by reducing vitamin K epoxide to the hydroquinone, an essential cofactor for the gamma-glutamyl carboxylation of many clotting factors. The physiological redox partner of VKOR remains uncertain, but is likely a thioredoxin-like protein. Here, we demonstrate that human VKOR has the same membrane topology as the enzyme from Synechococcus sp., whose crystal structure was recently determined. Our results suggest that, during the redox reaction, Cys43 in a luminal loop of human VKOR forms a transient disulfide bond with a thioredoxin (Trx)-like protein located in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We screened for redox partners of VKOR among the large number of mammalian Trx-like ER proteins by testing a panel of these candidates for their ability to form this specific disulfide bond with human VKOR. Our results show that VKOR interacts strongly with TMX, an ER membrane-anchored Trx-like protein with a unique CPAC active site. Weaker interactions were observed with TMX4, a close relative of TMX, and ERp18, the smallest Trx-like protein of the ER. We performed a similar screen with Ero1-alpha, an ER-luminal protein that oxidizes the Trx-like protein disulfide isomerase. We found that Ero1-alpha interacts with most of the tested Trx-like proteins, although only poorly with the membrane- anchored members of the family. Taken together, our results demonstrate that human VKOR employs the same electron transfer pathway as its bacterial homologs and that VKORs generally prefer membrane-bound Trx-like redox partners.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据