4.8 Article

An efficient, multiply promiscuous hydrolase in the alkaline phosphatase superfamily

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903951107

关键词

catalytic promiscuity; evolution; mechanism; sulfatase; superfamily

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  2. Medical Research Council (MRC)
  3. EU
  4. ProSA
  5. German National Academic Foundation
  6. BBSRC CASE/GlaxoSmithKline
  7. MRC [G0300193] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [G0300193] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a catalytically promiscuous enzyme able to efficiently promote the hydrolysis of six different substrate classes. Originally assigned as a phosphonate monoester hydrolase (PMH) this enzyme exhibits substantial second-order rate accelerations ((k(cat)/K-M)/k(w)), ranging from 10(7) to as high as 10(19), for the hydrolyses of phosphate mono-, di-, and triesters, phosphonate monoesters, sulfate monoesters, and sulfonate monoesters. This substrate collection encompasses a range of substrate charges between 0 and -2, transition states of a different nature, and involves attack at two different reaction centers (P and S). Intrinsic reactivities (half-lives) range from 200 days to 10(5) years under near neutrality. The substantial rate accelerations for a set of relatively difficult reactions suggest that efficient catalysis is not necessarily limited to efficient stabilization of just one transition state. The crystal structure of PMH identifies it as a member of the alkaline phosphatase superfamily. PMH encompasses four of the native activities previously observed in this superfamily and extends its repertoire by two further activities, one of which, sulfonate monoesterase, has not been observed previously for a natural enzyme. PMH is thus one of the most promiscuous hydrolases described to date. The functional links between superfamily activities can be presumed to have played a role in functional evolution by gene duplication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据