4.8 Article

Quantitative selection of DNA aptamers through microfluidic selection and high-throughput sequencing

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009331107

关键词

high-throughput DNA sequencing; PDGF-BB; Quantitative Selection of Aptamers through Sequencing; MicroMagnetic Separation device

资金

  1. Army Research Office (ARO) Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies
  2. Office of Naval Research
  3. Charlotte Geyer Foundation
  4. Midwest Progenitor Cell Consortium
  5. National Institutes of Health
  6. Korea Research Foundation [KRF-2008-357-C00086]
  7. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-357-C00086] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the integration of microfluidic selection with high-throughput DNA sequencing technology for rapid and efficient discovery of nucleic acid aptamers. The Quantitative Selection of Aptamers through Sequencing method tracks the copy number and enrichment-fold of more than 10 million individual sequences through multiple selection rounds, enabling the identification of high-affinity aptamers without the need for the pool to fully converge to a small number of sequences. Importantly, this method allows the discrimination of sequences that arise from experimental biases rather than true high-affinity target binding. As a demonstration, we have identified aptamers that specifically bind to PDGF-BB protein with K(d) < 3 nM within 3 rounds. Furthermore, we show that the aptamers identified by Quantitative Selection of Aptamers through Sequencing have similar to 3-8-fold higher affinity and similar to 2-4-fold higher specificity relative to those discovered through conventional cloning methods. Given that many biocombinatorial libraries are encoded with nucleic acids, we extrapolate that our method may be extended to other types of libraries for a range of molecular functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据