4.8 Article

Evidence that the polymerase of respiratory syncytial virus initiates RNA replication in a nontemplated fashion

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0913065107

关键词

Mononegavirales; paramyxovirus; RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; initiation

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK [94/P17132]
  2. National Institutes of Health [AI079328]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RNA virus polymerases must initiate replicative RNA synthesis with extremely high accuracy to maintain their genome termini and to avoid generating defective genomes. For the single-stranded negative-sense RNA viruses, it is not known how this accuracy is achieved. To investigate this question, mutations were introduced into the 3' terminal base of a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) template, and the RNA products were examined to determine the impact of the mutation. To perform the assay, RNA replication was reconstituted using a modified minireplicon system in which replication was limited to a single step. Importantly, this system allowed analysis of RSV RNA generated intracellularly, but from a defined template that was not subject to selection by replication. Sequence analysis of RNA products generated from templates containing 1U-C and 1U-A substitutions showed that, in both cases, replication products were initiated with a nontemplated, WTAresidue, rather than a templated G or U residue, indicating that the polymerase selects the terminal NTP independently of the template. Examination of a template in which the position 1 nucleotide was deleted supported these findings. This mutant directed efficient replication at similar to 60% of WT levels, and its product was found to be initiated at the WT position (-1 relative to the template) with a WT A residue. These findings show that the RSV replicase selects ATP and initiates at the correct position, independently of the first nucleotide of the template, suggesting a mechanism by which highly accurate replication initiation is achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据