4.8 Article

Arabidopsis PIS1 encodes the ABCG37 transporter of auxinic compounds including the auxin precursor indole-3-butyric acid

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1005878107

关键词

PDR9; PDR8; IBA transport; auxin synthesis

资金

  1. Research Foundation-Flanders
  2. Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [IAA601630703]
  3. Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic [LC06034, MSM0021622415]
  4. Forschungskredit of the University of Zurich
  5. Novartis Foundation
  6. Swiss National Fonds
  7. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science
  8. Robert A. Welch Foundation [C-1309]
  9. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-06ER15804]
  10. National Institutes of Health [1K99GM089987, GM067203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Differential distribution of the plant hormone auxin within tissues mediates a variety of developmental processes. Cellular auxin levels are determined by metabolic processes including synthesis, degradation, and (de) conjugation, as well as by auxin transport across the plasma membrane. Whereas transport of free auxins such as naturally occurring indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is well characterized, little is known about the transport of auxin precursors and metabolites. Here, we identify amutation in the ABCG37 gene of Arabidopsis that causes the polar auxin transport inhibitor sensitive1 (pis1) phenotype manifested by hypersensitivity to auxinic compounds. ABCG37 encodes the pleiotropic drug resistance transporter that transports a range of synthetic auxinic compounds as well as the endogenous auxin precursor indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), but not free IAA. ABCG37 and its homolog ABCG36 act redundantly at outermost root plasma membranes and, unlike established IAA transporters from the PIN and ABCB families, transport IBA out of the cells. Our findings explore possible novel modes of regulating auxin homeostasis and plant development by means of directional transport of the auxin precursor IBA and presumably also other auxin metabolites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据