4.8 Article

Reactive and nonreactive quenching of O(1D) by the potent greenhouse gases SO2F2, NF3, and SF5CF3

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911228107

关键词

atmosphere; chemistry; climate; kinetics

资金

  1. NASA [NNG06GD90G, NNX09AE27G]
  2. U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (USAFRL)
  3. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy
  4. NASA [NNX09AE27G, 119178] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A laser flash photolysis-resonance fluorescence technique has been employed to measure rate coefficients and physical vs. reactive quenching branching ratios for O(1D) deactivation by three potent greenhouse gases, SO2F2(k(1)), NF3(k(2)), and SF5CF3(k(3)). In excellent agreement with one published study, we find that k(1)(T) = 9.0 x 10(-11) exp (+98/T) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) and that the reactive quenching rate coefficient is k(1b) (5.8 +/- 2.3) x 10(-11) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) independent of temperature. We find that k(2)(T) = 2.0 x 10(-11) exp (+52/T) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) with reaction proceeding almost entirely (similar to 99%) by reactive quenching. Reactive quenching of O(D-1) by NF3 is more than a factor of two faster than reported in one published study, a result that will significantly lower the model-derived atmospheric lifetime and global warming potential of NF3. Deactivation of O(D-1) by SF5CF3 is slow enough (k(3) < 2.0 x 10(-13) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) at 298 K) that reaction with O(D-1) is unimportant as an atmospheric removal mechanism for SF5CF3. The kinetics of O(D-1) reactions with SO2 (k(4)) and CS2 (k(5)) have also been investigated at 298 K. We find that k(4) = (2.2 +/- 0.3) x 10(-10) and k(5) = (4.6 +/- 0.6) x 10(-10) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1); branching ratios for reactive quenching are 0.76 +/- 0.12 and 0.94 +/- 0.06 for the SO2 and CS2 reactions, respectively. All uncertainties reported above are estimates of accuracy (2 sigma) and rate coefficients k(i) (T) (i = 1; 2) calculated from the above Arrhenius expressions have estimated accuracies of +15% (2 sigma).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据