4.8 Article

Human RORγt+ TH17 cells preferentially differentiate from naive FOXP3+Treg in the presence of lineage-specific polarizing factors

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1008247107

关键词

IL-1; IL-17; IL-23; TGF-beta; CD4 T cells

资金

  1. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  2. Cancer Research Institute
  3. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (France)
  4. Institut National du Cancer (France)
  5. Conseil Regional des Pays de la Loire (France)
  6. European regional development fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ROR gamma t(+) T(H)17 cells are a proinflammatory CD4(+) T-cell population associated with autoimmune tissue injury. In mice, priming of T(H)17 requires TGF-beta, which alone directs the priming of FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells (Treg), in association with inflammatory cytokines. Priming of human T(H)17 cells from conventional naive CD4(+) T cells under similar conditions, however, has proved difficult to achieve. Here, we report that differentiation of human T(H)17 cells preferentially occurs from FOXP3+ naive Treg ( NTreg) in the presence of IL-2 and IL-1 beta and is increased by IL-23 and TGF-beta. IL-1 beta-mediated differentiation correlated with IL-1RI expression in stimulated NTreg and was accompanied by induction of ROR gamma t along with down-regulation of FOXP3. IL-17-secreting cells in NTreg cultures cosecreted TNF-alpha and IL-2 and contained distinct subpopulations cosecreting or not cosecreting IFN-gamma and other T(H)17-associated cytokines. Polarized NTreg contained significant subpopulations of CCR6-expressing cells that were highly enriched in IL-17-secreting cells. Finally, analysis of CCR6 expression with respect to that of IL-1RI identified distinct IL-17-secreting subpopulations that had maintained or lost their suppressive functions. Together our results support the concept that priming of human T(H)17 from naive CD4(+) T cells preferentially takes place from FOXP3(+) Treg precursors in the presence of lineage-specific polarizing factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据