4.8 Article

Information-theoretic analysis of phenotype changes in early stages of carcinogenesis

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1005283107

关键词

microarray analysis; oncogenic transformation; surprisal analysis; maximal entropy; gene transcription patterns

资金

  1. Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer is a multistep process characterized by altered signal transduction, cell growth, and metabolism. To identify such processes in early carcinogenesis we use an information theoretic approach to characterize gene expression quanti. ed as mRNA levels in primary keratinocytes (K) and human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16)-transformed keratinocytes (HF1 cells) from early (E) and late (L) passages and from benzo(a) pyrene-treated (BP) L cells. Our starting point is that biological signaling processes are subjected to the same quantitative laws as inanimate, nonequilibrium chemical systems. Environmental and genomic constraints thereby limit the maximal thermodynamic entropy that the biological system can reach. The procedure uncovers the changes in gene expression patterns in different networks and de. nes the signi. cance of each altered network in the establishment of a particular phenotype. The development of transformed HF1 cells is shown to be represented by one major transcription pattern that is important at all times. Two minor transcription patterns are also identi. ed, one that contributes at early times and a distinguishably different pattern that contributes at later times. All three transcription patterns de. ned by our analysis were validated by gene expression values and biochemical means. The major transcription pattern includes reduced transcripts participating in the apoptotic network and enhanced transcripts participating in cell cycle, glycolysis, and oxidative phosphorylation. The two minor patterns identify genes that are mainly involved in lipid or carbohydrate metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据