4.8 Article

γc deficiency precludes CD8+ T cell memory despite formation of potent T cell effectors

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0913729107

关键词

cytotoxic T lymphocyte; homeostasis; cytokine

资金

  1. Center for Human Immunology
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Canadian Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Foundation
  4. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec
  5. Canadian Louis Pasteur Foundation
  6. Institut Pasteur
  7. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  8. European Community Network of Excellence [MUGEN LSHG-CT-2005-005203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several cytokines (including IL-2, IL-7, IL-15, and IL-21) that signal through receptors sharing the common gamma chain (gamma(c)) are critical for the generation and peripheral homeostasis of naive and memory T cells. Recently, we demonstrated that effector functions fail to develop in CD4(+)T cells that differentiate in the absence of gamma(c). To assess the role of gamma(c) cytokines in cell-fate decisions that condition effector versus memory CD8(+)T cell generation, we compared the response of CD8(+)T cells from gamma(c) + or gamma(-)(c) P14 TCR transgenic mice after challenge with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. The intrinsic IL-7-dependent survival defect of gamma(-)(c) naive CD8+T cells was corrected by transgenic expression of human Bcl-2. We demonstrated that although gamma(c)-dependent signals are dispensable for the initial expansion and the acquisition of cytotoxic functions following antigenic stimulation, they condition the terminal proliferation and differentiation of CD8(+) effector T cells (i.e., KLRG1(high) CD127(low) short-lived effector T cells) via the transcription factor, T-bet. Moreover, the gamma(c)-dependent signals that are critical for memory T cell formation are not rescued by Bd2 overexpression. Together, these data reveal an unexpected divergence in the requirement for gamma(c) cytokines in the differentiation of CD4(+) versus CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据