4.8 Article

One-step DNA melting in the RNA polymerase cleft opens the initiation bubble to form an unstable open complex

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1000967107

关键词

bottleneck step; transcription regulation; burst experiment; protein nucleic acid interactions

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM23467, NIH 5 T32 GM08349]
  2. William R. and Dorothy E. Sullivan Distinguished Graduate Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Though opening of the start site (+1) region of promoter DNA is required for transcription by RNA polymerase ( RNAP), surprisingly little is known about how and when this occurs in the mechanism. Early events at the lambda P-R promoter load this region of duplex DNA into the active site cleft of Escherichia coli RNAP, forming the closed, permanganate-unreactive intermediate I-1. Conversion to the subsequent intermediate I-2 overcomes a large enthalpic barrier. Is I-2 open? Herewecreate a burst of I-2 by rapidly destabilizing opencomplexes (RPo) with 1.1MNaCl. Fast footprinting reveals that thymines at positions from -11 to+2 inI(2) arepermanganate-reactive, demonstrating that RNAP opens the entire initiation bubble in the cleft in a single step. Rates of decay of all observed thymine reactivities are the same as the I-2 to I-1 conversion rate determined by filter binding. In I-2, permanganatereactivity of the +1 thymine on the template(t) strand is the same as the RPo control, whereas nontemplate (nt) thymines are significantly less reactive than in RPo. We propose that: (i) the +1(t) thymine is in the active site in I-2; (ii) conversion of I-2 to RPo repositions the nt strand in the cleft; and (iii) movements of the nt strand are coupled to the assembly and DNA binding of the downstream clamp and jaw that occurs after DNA opening and stabilizes RPo. We hypothesize that unstable open intermediates at the.PR promoter resemble the unstable, transcriptionally competent open complexes formed at ribosomal promoters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据