4.8 Article

Generation of recombinant lymphocytic choriomeningitis viruses with trisegmented genomes stably expressing two additional genes of interest

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0900088106

关键词

antiviral screen; reverse genetic; viral attenuation

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI047140, U54 AI065359, AI-065359, R56 AI047140, AI-075298-01, R01 AI075298, AI-47140, R56 AI075298] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several arenaviruses cause hemorrhagic fever disease in humans for which no licensed vaccines are available and current therapeutic intervention is limited to the off- label use of the wide-spectrum antiviral ribavirin. However, the prototypic arenavirus lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) has proven to be a Rosetta stone for the investigation of virus-host interactions. Arenaviruses have a bisegmented negative-strand RNA genome. The S segment encodes for the virus nucleoprotein and glycoprotein, whereas the L segment encodes for the virus polymerase (L) and Z protein. The ability to generate recombinant LCMV (rLCMV) expressing additional foreign genes of interest would open novel avenues for the study of virushost interactions and the development of novel vaccine strategies and high-throughput screens to identify antiarenaviral molecules. To this end, we have developed a trisegmented (1L + 2S) rLCMV- based approach (r3LCMV). Each of the two S segments in r3LCMV was altered to replace one of the viral genes by a gene of interest. All r3LCMVs examined expressing different reported genes were stable both genetically and phenotypically and exhibited wild-type growth properties in cultured cells. Reporter gene expression in r3LCMV-infected cells provided an accurate surrogate of levels of virus multiplication. Notably, some r3LCMVs displayed highly attenuated virulence in mice but induced protective immunity against a subsequent lethal challenge with wild-type LCMV, supporting the potential development of r3LCMV-based vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据