4.8 Article

EZH2 is a mediator of EWS/FLI1 driven tumor growth and metastasis blocking endothelial and neuro-ectodermal differentiation

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810759106

关键词

epigenetic regulation; Ewing tumor; stemness

资金

  1. Else-Kroner-Fresenius Stiftung [P31/08HA123/07]
  2. Bayerisches Staatsministerium fur Wissenschaft und Kunst [KKF8739175, 1528/TUM11.16-9c/32269]
  3. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF/DLR) Kompetenznetz Padiatrische Onkologie/TP Immunund Gentherapie [G19965]
  4. Wilhelm-Sander Stiftung [2006.109.1]
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [18046-B12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ewing tumors (ET) are highly malignant, localized in bone or soft tissue, and are molecularly defined by ews/ets translocations. DNA microarray analysis revealed a relationship of ET to both endothelium and fetal neural crest. We identified expression of histone methyltransferase enhancer of Zeste, Drosophila, Homolog 2 (EZH2) to be increased in ET. Suppressive activity of EZH2 maintains sternness in normal and malignant cells. Here, we found EWS/FLI1 bound to the EZH2 promoter in vivo, and induced EZH2 expression in ET and mesenchymal stem cells. Down-regulation of EZH2 by RNA interference in ET suppressed oncogenic transformation by inhibiting clonogenicity in vitro. Similarly, tumor development and metastasis was suppressed in immunodeficient Rag2(-/-)gamma c(-/-) mice. EZH2-mediated gene silencing was shown to be dependent on histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity. Subsequent microarray analysis of EZH2 knock down, HDAC-inhibitor treatment and confirmation in independent assays revealed an undifferentiated phenotype maintained by EZH2 in ET. EZH2 regulated sternness genes such as nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR), as well as genes involved in neuroectodermal and endothelial differentiation (EMP1, EPHB2, GFAP, and GAP43). These data suggest that EZH2 might have a central role in ET pathology by shaping the oncogenicity and stem cell phenotype of this tumor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据