4.8 Article

Intracellular calcium activates TRPM2 and its alternative spliced isoforms

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811725106

关键词

Ca2+ signaling; gating mechanism; ADP-ribose; calmodulin-binding domain; oxidative stress

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL078960]
  2. Department of Public Health [2009-0099]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Melastatin-related transient receptor potential channel 2 (TRPM2) is a Ca2+-permeable, nonselective cation channel that is involved in oxidative stress-induced cell death and inflammation processes. Although TRPM2 can be activated by ADP-ribose (ADPR) in vitro, it was unknown how TRPM2 is gated in vivo. Moreover, several alternative spliced isoforms of TRPM2 identified recently are insensitive to ADPR, and their gating mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we report that intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+](i)) can activate TRPM2 as well as its spliced isoforms. We demonstrate that TRPM2 mutants with disrupted ADPR-binding sites can be activated readily by [Ca2+](i), indicating that [Ca2+](i) gating of TRPM2 is independent of ADPR. The mechanism by which [Ca2+](i) activates TRPM2 is via a calmodulin (CaM)-binding domain in the N terminus of TRPM2. Whereas Ca2+-mediated TRPM2 activation is independent of ADPR and ADPR-binding sites, both [Ca2+](i) and the CaM-binding motif are required for ADPR-mediated TRPM2 gating. Importantly, we demonstrate that intracellular Ca2+ release activates both recombinant and endogenous TRPM2 in intact cells. Moreover, receptor activation-induced Ca2+ release is capable of activating TRPM2. These results indicate that [Ca2+](i) is a key activator of TRPM2 and the only known activator of the spliced isoforms of TRPM2. Our findings suggest that [Ca2+](i)-mediated activation of TRPM2 and its alternative spliced isoforms may represent a major gating mechanism in vivo, therefore conferring important physiological and pathological functions of TRPM2 and its spliced isoforms in response to elevation of [Ca2+](i).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据