4.8 Article

Intrathymic proliferation wave essential for Vα14+ natural killer T cell development depends on c-Myc

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0812255106

关键词

iNKT cells; cell cycle; nonconventional lymphocytes

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI059676]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  3. Lady Tata Memorial Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular requirements for invariant V alpha 14-bearing natural killer T cells (iNKT) in the thymus are poorly understood. A minute population of approximate to 500 newly selected CD69(+)CD24(+) stage 0 (ST0) iNKT cells gives rise to approximate to 100 times more CD44(neg/lo)CD24(-) stage 1 (ST1) cells, which then generate similar frequencies of CD44(hi)CD24(-) stage 2 (ST2) and mature iNKT cells. Although the increased number of ST1 compared with ST0 cells indicates the initiation of a proliferation wave in the very early stages of iNKT cell development, details about the controlling mechanism are currently lacking. Here, we show that the transcription factor c-Myc is required for iNKT cell development. Conditional ablation of c-Myc in double-positive thymocytes specifically impacted iNKT but not conventional T cell development. Within the iNKT population, a progressive reduction of iNKT cells was observed starting at ST1 (approximate to 50-fold) and ST2 (approximate to 350-fold), with a complete lack of mature cells in thymus, spleen, and liver. ST0/ST1 c-Myc-deficient iNKT cells showed reduced proliferation. In contrast, annexin V staining did not reveal increased apoptosis, and transgenic overexpression of BCL-2 did not rescue iNKT cell development in c-Myc-deficient mice. Moreover, expression of known iNKT differentiation factors such as Plzf and Gata3 was not dramatically altered. These, findings provide compelling evidence that c-Myc mediates an intrathymic proliferation wave immediately after agonist selection of iNKT cells and illustrate the importance of this expansion for the generation of mature iNKT cells in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据