4.8 Article

Multiscale mobility networks and the spatial spreading of infectious diseases

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0906910106

关键词

complex networks; computational epidemiology; human mobility; multiscale phenomena

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R21-DA024259]
  2. Lilly Endowment [2008 1639-000]
  3. Defense Threat ReductionAgency [1-0910039]
  4. Future Emerging Technologies [231807]
  5. European Research Council Ideas [ERC-2007-Stg204863]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among the realistic ingredients to be considered in the computational modeling of infectious diseases, human mobility represents a crucial challenge both on the theoretical side and in view of the limited availability of empirical data. To study the interplay between short-scale commuting flows and long-range airline traffic in shaping the spatiotemporal pattern of a global epidemic we (i) analyze mobility data from 29 countries around the world and find a gravity model able to provide a global description of commuting patterns up to 300 kms and (ii) integrate in a worldwide-structured metapopulation epidemic model a timescale-separation technique for evaluating the force of infection due to multiscale mobility processes in the disease dynamics. Commuting flows are found, on average, to be one order of magnitude larger than airline flows. However, their introduction into the worldwide model shows that the large-scale pattern of the simulated epidemic exhibits only small variations with respect to the baseline case where only airline traffic is considered. The presence of short-range mobility increases, however, the synchronization of sub-populations in close proximity and affects the epidemic behavior at the periphery of the airline transportation infrastructure. The present approach outlines the possibility for the definition of layered computational approaches where different modeling assumptions and granularities can be used consistently in a unifying multiscale framework.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据