4.8 Article

Long-term efficacy and safety of all-trans retinoic acid/arsenic trioxide-based therapy in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0813280106

关键词

combination therapy; 5-year EFS; 5-year OS; residual disease; arsenic retention

资金

  1. Shanghai Institute of Hematology
  2. National High Tech Program for Biotechnology [863:2006AA02A405]
  3. Chinese National Key Basic Research Project [2004 CB 518606]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30672772, 30623010, 30521003]
  5. Key Discipline Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [Y0201]
  6. Shanghai Municipal Commission for Science and Technology [06DZ22021]
  7. Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation Co-PI Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)/arsenic trioxide (ATO) combination-based therapy has benefitted newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in short-term studies, but the long-term efficacy and safety remained unclear. From April 2001, we have followed 85 patients administrated ATRA/ATO with a median follow-up of 70 months. Eighty patients (94.1%) entered complete remission (CR). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 89.2% +/- 3.4% and 91.7% +/- 3.0%, respectively, and the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS for patients who achieved CR (n = 80) were 94.8% +/- 2.5% and 97.4% +/- 1.8%, respectively. Upon ATRA/ATO, prognosis was not influenced by initial white blood cell count, distinct PML-RAR alpha types, or FLT3 mutations. The toxicity profile was mild and reversible. No secondary carcinoma was observed, and 24 months after the last dose of ATRA/ATO, patients had urine arsenic concentrations well below the safety limit. These results demonstrate the high efficacy and minimal toxicity of ATRA/ATO treatment for newly diagnosed APL in long-term follow-up, suggesting a potential frontline therapy for de novo APL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据