4.8 Article

T-705 (favipiravir) activity against lethal H5N1 influenza A viruses

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0909603107

关键词

antiviral compounds; murine lethal-infection model; neuraminidase

资金

  1. Specially Promoted Research and for Scientific Research
  2. Founding Research Centers for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases
  3. Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology (Japan)
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  5. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Public Health Service
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivi are used to treat H5N1 influenza. However, oseltamivir-resistant H5N1 viruses have been isolated from oseltamivir-treated patients. Moreover, reassortment between H5N1 viruses and oseltamvir-resistant human H1N1 viruses currently circulating could create oseltamivir-resistant H5N1 viruses, rendering the oseltamivir stockpile obsolete. Therefore, there is a need for unique and effective antivirals to combat H5N1 influenza viruses. The investigational drug T-705 (favipiravir; 6-fluoro-3-hydroxy-2-pyrazinecarboxamide) has antiviral activity against seasonal influenza viruses and a mouse-adapted H5N1 influenza virus derived from a benign duck virus. However, its efficacy against highly pathogenic H5N1 viruses, which are substantially more virulent, remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that T-705 effectively protects mice from lethal infection with oseltamivir-sensitive or -resistant highly pathogenic H5N1 viruses. Furthermore, our biochemical analysis suggests that T-705 ribofuranosyl triphosphate, an active form of T-705, acts like purines or purine nucleosides in human cells and does not inhibit human DNA synthesis. We conclude that T-705 shows promise as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据