4.8 Article

A FERM domain autoregulates Drosophila myosin 7a activity

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808682106

关键词

regulation; electron microscopy; ATPase activity

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C004906/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Full-length Drosophila myosin 7a ( myosin 7a-FL) has a complex tail containing a short predicted coiled coil followed by a MyTH4-FERM domain, an SH3 domain, and a C-terminal MyTH4-FERM domain. Myosin 7a-FL expressed in Sf9 cells is monomeric despite the predicted coiled coil. We showed previously that Subfragment-1 (S1) from this myosin has MgATPase of V-max approximate to 1s(-1) and K-ATPase approximate to 1 mu M actin. We find that myosin 7a-FL has Vmax similar to S1 but K-ATPase approximate to 30 mu M. Thus, at low actin concentrations ( 5 mu M), the MgATPase of S1 is fully activated, whereas that of myosin 7a-FL is low, suggesting that the tail regulates activity. Electron microscopy of myosin 7a-FL with ATP shows the tail is tightly bent back against the motor domain. Myosin 7a-FL extends at either high ionic strength or without ATP, revealing the motor domain, lever, and tail. A series of C-terminal truncations show that deletion of 99 aa ( the MyTH7 subdomain of the C-terminal FERM domain) is sufficient to abolish bending, and the K-ATPase is then similar to S1. This region is highly conserved in myosin 7a. We found that a double mutation in it, R2140A-K2143A, abolishes bending and reduces K-ATPase to S1 levels. In addition, the expressed C-terminal FERM domain binds actin with K-d approximate to 30 mu M regardless of ATP, similar to the K-ATPase value for myosin 7a-FL. We propose that at low cellular actin concentrations, myosin 7a-FL is bent and inactive, but at high actin concentrations, it is unfolded and active because the C-terminal FERM domain binds to actin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据