4.8 Article

The electronic structure of the primary electron donor of reaction centers of purple bacteria at atomic resolution as observed by photo-CIDNP 13C NMR

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0908608106

关键词

electron transfer; nuclear polarization; photosynthesis; solid-state NMR; electronic structure

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [700.50.521]
  2. Vidi grant [700.53.423]
  3. Volkswagen-Stiftung [I/78010]
  4. EMBO [ASTF-131-2005]
  5. [700.50.004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Composed of the two bacteriochlorophyll cofactors, P-L and P-M, the special pair functions as the primary electron donor in bacterial reaction centers of purple bacteria of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Under light absorption, an electron is transferred to a bacteriopheophytin and a radical pair is produced. The occurrence of the radical pair is linked to the production of enhanced nuclear polarization called photochemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization (photo-CIDNP). This effect can be used to study the electronic structure of the special pair at atomic resolution by detection of the strongly enhanced nuclear polarization with laser-flash photo-CIDNP magic-angle spinning NMR on the carotenoid-less mutant R26. In the electronic ground state, P-L is strongly disturbed, carrying a slightly negative charge. In the radical cation state, the ratio of total electron spin densities between P-L and P-M is 2: 1, although it is 2.5:1 for the pyrrole carbons, 2.2:1 for all porphyrinic carbons, and 4: 1 for the pyrrole nitrogen. It is shown that the symmetry break between the electronic structures in the electronic ground state and in the radical cation state is an intrinsic property of the special pair supermolecule, which is particularly attributable to a modification of the structure of P-L. The significant difference in electron density distribution between the ground and radical cation states is explained by an electric polarization effect of the nearby histidine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据