4.8 Article

Transcellular biosynthesis of cysteinyl leukotrienes in vivo during mouse peritoneal inflammation

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903851106

关键词

chimeric mice; leukotriene B4; mass spectrometry; leukotriene E4; 5-lipoxygenase

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL025785]
  2. European Community [LSHM- CT- 2004- 005033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leukotrienes (LTs) are lipid mediators of inflammation formed by enzymatic oxidation of arachidonic acid. One intriguing aspect of LT production is transcellular biosynthesis: cells expressing 5-lipoxygenase (5LO) form LTA(4) and transfer it to cells expressing LTA(4) hydrolase (LTA(4)H) or LTC4 synthase (LTC4S) to produce LTB4 or LTC4. This process has been demonstrated in vivo for LTB4, but not for cysteinyl LTs (cysLTs). We examined transcellular cysLT synthesis during zymosan-induced peritonitis, using bone marrow transplants with transgenic mice deficient in key enzymes of LT synthesis and analyzing all eicosanoids by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. WT mice time-dependently produced LTB4 and cysLTs (LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4). 5LO(-/-) mice were incapable of producing LTs. WT bone marrow cells restored this biosynthetic ability, but 5LO(-/-) bone marrow did not rescue LT synthesis in irradiated WT mice, demonstrating that bone marrow-derived cells are the ultimate source of all LTs in this model. Total levels of 5LO-derived products were comparable in LTA(4)H(-/-) and WT mice, but were reduced in LTC4S-/- animals. No differences in prostaglandin production were observed between these transgenic or chimeric mice. Bone marrow cells from LTA(4)H(-/-) or LTC4S-/- mice injected into 5LO(-/-) mice restored the ability to synthesize LTB4 and cysLTs, providing unequivocal evidence of efficient transcellular biosynthesis of cysLTs. These results highlight the potential relevance of transcellular exchange of LTA(4) for the synthesis of LTs mediating biological activities during inflammatory events in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据