4.8 Article

Nonparametric entrainment of the in vitro circadian phosphorylation rhythm of cyanobacterial KaiC by temperature cycle

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0806741106

关键词

circadian clock; KaiC phosphorylation rhythm; Phase response; temperature entrainment

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [15GS0308]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15GS0308] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The three cyanobacterial Kai proteins and ATP are capable of generating an autonomous rhythm of KaiC phosphorylation in a test tube. As the period is approximate to 24 hours and is stable in a wide temperature range, this rhythm is thought to function as the basic oscillator of the cyanobacterial circadian system. We have examined the rhythm under various temperature cycles and found that it was stably entrained by a temperature cycle of 20-28 hours. As the period length was not altered by temperature, entrainment by period change could be excluded from possible mechanisms. Instead, temperature steps between 30 degrees and 45 degrees C and vice versa shifted the phase of the rhythm in a phase-dependent manner. Based on the phase response curves of the step-up and step-down in temperature, phase shift by single temperature pulse was estimated using a nonparametric entrainment model (discontinuous phase jump by external stimuli). The predicted phase shift was consistent with the experimentally measured phase shift. Next, successive phase shifts caused by repeated temperature cycles were computed by two phase response curves and compared with actual entrainment of the rhythm. As the entrainment pattern observed after various combinations of temperature cycles matched the prediction, it is likely that nonparametric entrainment functions even in the simple three-protein system. We also analyzed entrainment of KaiC phosphorylation by temperature cycle in cyanobacterial cells and found both the parametric and the nonparametric models function in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据