4.8 Article

Principal determinants leading to transition state formation of a protein-protein complex, orientation trumps side-chain interactions

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809800106

关键词

equilibrium thermodynamics; hot spot; protein recognition; transition state thermodynamics; binding pathways

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health Grants [DK61062, GM55694]
  2. American Heart Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The binding transition state (TS) is the rate-limiting step for transient molecular interactions. This important step in the molecular recognition process, however, is largely understood only at a qualitative level. To establish a more quantitative picture of the TS structure, we exploit a set of biophysical techniques that have provided major insights in protein folding applications. As a model system representing the large class of weakly charged protein protein interactions, we examine the binding of a variety of human growth hormone (hGH) variants to the human growth hormone receptor (hGHR) and the human prolactin receptor (hPRLR). hGH variants were chosen to probe different features of the TS structure, based on their highly reengineered interfaces. Both Eyring and urea (m value) analyses suggest that the majority of binding surface burial occurs after TS. A comprehensive phi analysis showed that individual hGH interface residues do not contribute energetically to the stability of the TS, but there is a TS hot spot in the receptor. Zinc dependence studies that take advantage of an endogenous tetracoordinated interfacial metal binding demonstrate that surfaces of the molecules have attained a high orientational complementarity by the time the TS is reached. The model that best fits these data are that a knobs-into-holes process precisely aligns the two molecular interfaces in forming the TS structure. Surprisingly, most of the thermodynamic character of the binding reaction is focused in the fine-tuning process occurring after TS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据