4.8 Article

Ultraslow oligomerization equilibria of p53 and its implications

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0907840106

关键词

mass spectrometry; protein-protein interactions; slow association; tetramerization domain

资金

  1. MRC [MC_U105474168] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U105474168] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U105474168] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tumor suppressor p53 is in equilibrium at cellular concentrations between dimers and tetramers. Oncogenic mutant p53 (mut) exerts a dominant-negative effect on co-expression of p53 wildtype (wt) and mut alleles in cancer cells. It is believed that wt and mut form hetero-tetramers of attenuated activity, via their tetramerization domains. Using electrospray mass spectrometry on isotopically labeled samples, we measured directly the composition and rates of formation of p53 complexes in the presence and absence of response element DNA. The dissociation of tetramers was unexpectedly very slow (t(1/2) = 40 min) at 37 degrees C, matched by slow association of dimers, which is approximately four times longer than the half-life of spontaneous denaturation of wt p53. On mixing wt tetramers with the oncogenic contact mutant R273H of low DNA affinity, we observed the same slow formation of only wt(4), wt(2)mut(2), and mut(4), in the ratio 1:2:1, on a cellular time scale. On mixing wt and mut with response element DNAs P21 and BAX, we observed only the complexes wt(4).DNA, wt(2)mut(2).DNA, and mut(4).DNA, with relative dissociation constants 1:4:71 and 1:13:85, respectively, accounting for the dominant-negative effect by weakened affinity. p53 dimers assemble rapidly to tetramers on binding to response element DNA, initiated by the p53 DNA binding domains. The slow oligomerization of free p53, competing with spontaneous denaturation, has implications for the possible regulation of p53 by binding proteins and DNA that affect tetramerization kinetics as well as equilibria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据