4.8 Article

Sulindac confers high level ischemic protection to the heart through late preconditioning mechanisms

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911046106

关键词

cardioprotection; myocardial ischemia

资金

  1. American Heart Association
  2. Florida State University Research Commercialization Assistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have recently shown that sulindac, an anti-inflammatory drug, enhances the killing of cancer cells, but not normal cells, under conditions of oxidative stress, by mechanisms unrelated to its cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition. To further study the protective effect of sulindac on cells exposed to oxidative stress, we have investigated the effect of sulindac on rat cardiac myocytes subjected to hypoxia/reoxygenation, as well as in a Langendorff model of myocardial ischemia. Low levels of sulindac could protect cardiac myocytes against cell death due to hypoxia/reoxygenation. In the Langendorff model sulindac provided significant protection against cell death, when the drug was fed to the animals before the removal of the heart for the Langendorff procedure. The results indicate that the primary protective effect of sulindac in these experiments does not involve its role as a COX inhibitor. Numerous signaling pathways have been implicated in myocardial protective mechanisms, many of which involve fluctuations in reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. The results suggest that low levels of sulindac can induce a preconditioning response, triggered by ROS, to protect cardiac tissues against oxidative damage. Blocking of preconditioning pathways by administration of the PKC blocker chelerythrine abrogated the ischemic protection afforded by sulindac. Secondly, after feeding of sulindac, two end-effectors of preconditioning, inducible nitric oxide synthase and heat shock protein 27, were found to be markedly induced in the heart, dependent on PKC. These results suggest that sulindac may have therapeutic potential as a preconditioning agent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据