4.8 Article

Consumers indirectly increase infection risk in grassland food webs

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808778106

关键词

apparent competition; dilution effect; disease ecology; grazing; healthy herds

资金

  1. National Science Foundation/National Institutes of Health Ecology of Infectious Diseases [05-25666, 05-25641, 0525669]
  2. California Integrated Hardwood and Range Management Program
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology [0525669] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most pathogens exist within complicated food webs of interacting hosts, vectors, competitors, and predators. Although theory has demonstrated a variety of mechanisms by which predation and competition in food webs can indirectly control infection risk in hosts, there have until now been no experimental tests of this theory. We sampled the effect of long-term exclusion of large vertebrate herbivores on the prevalence of infection by a group of aphid-vectored viruses that infect grasses (barley and cereal yellow dwarf viruses) in an oak savannah in central California. We found that pathogen prevalence was similar to 4-fold higher in the presence of consumers than in areas where they were excluded. Vertebrate consumers did not directly alter infection rates by this aphid-vectored pathogen group, but rather increased infection risk by increasing the relative abundance of highly-competent hosts in the grassland community. This large-scale experiment, measuring changes in host abundance and infection risk in response to altered consumption rates, confirms theoretical predictions that consumers can indirectly increase infection risk by altering the composition of whole communities. Most importantly, these results demonstrate that, even in complex natural communities, alterations to food web composition such as consumer invasion or extinction can lead to significant impacts that cascade throughout entire communities, including changes in infection risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据