4.8 Article

The role of the CD58 locus in multiple sclerosis

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0813310106

关键词

genetic; human; RNA; quantitative trait; inflammation

资金

  1. NIH [R01SN24247, P01 A039671]
  2. National Multiple Scelrosis Society [FG-1718-Al]
  3. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS46341]
  4. Foundation Flanders, Belgium (F.W.O.-Vlaanderen)
  5. International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium
  6. NINDS [R01 NS43559]
  7. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10335] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system associated with demyelination and axonal loss. A whole genome association scan suggested that allelic variants in the CD58 gene region, encoding the costimulatory molecule LFA-3, are associated with risk of developing MS. We now report additional genetic evidence, as well as resequencing and fine mapping of the CD58 locus in patients with MS and control subjects. These efforts identify a CD58 variant that provides further evidence of association with MS (P = 1.1 x 10(-6), OR 0.82) and the single protective effect within the CD58 locus is captured by the rs2300747(G) allele. This protective rs2300747G allele is associated with a dose-dependent increase in CD58 mRNA expression in lymphoblastic cell lines (P = 1.1 x 10(-10)) and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from MS subjects (P = 0.0037). This protective effect of enhanced CD58 expression on circulating mononuclear cells in patients with MS is supported by finding that CD58 mRNA expression is higher in MS subjects during clinical remission. Functional investigations suggest a potential mechanism whereby increases in CD58 expression, mediated by the protective allele, up-regulate the expression of transcription factor FoxP3 through engagement of the CD58 receptor, CD2, leading to the enhanced function of CD4(+)CD25(high) regulatory T cells that are defective in subjects with MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据