4.8 Article

Petroleomics: Chemistry of the underworld

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0805069105

关键词

Fourier transform; ion cyclotron resonance; mass spectrometry; petroleum; fossil fuel

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-06-54118]
  2. Florida State University
  3. National High Magnetic Field Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Each different molecular elemental composition-e.g., C(c)H(h)N(n)O(o)S(s)-has a different exact mass. With sufficiently high mass resolving power (m/Delta m(50%) approximate to 400,000, in which m is molecular mass and Delta m(50%) is the mass spectral peak width at half-maximum peak height) and mass accuracy (<300 ppb) up to approximate to 800 Da, now routinely available from high-field (>= 9.4 T) Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, it is possible to resolve and identify uniquely and simultaneously each of the thousands of elemental compositions from the most complex natural organic mixtures, including petroleum crude oil. It is thus possible to separate and sort petroleum components according to their heteroatom class (N(n)O(o)S(s)), double bond equivalents (DBE = number of rings plus double bonds involving carbon, because each ring or double bond results in a loss of two hydrogen atoms), and carbon number. Petroleomics is the characterization of petroleum at the molecular level. From sufficiently complete characterization of the organic composition of petroleum and its products, it should be possible to correlate (and ultimately predict) their properties and behavior. Examples include molecular mass distribution, distillation profile, characterization of specific fractions without prior extraction or wet chemical separation from the original bulk material, biodegradation, maturity, water solubility (and oil:water emulsion behavior), deposits in oil wells and refineries, efficiency and specificity of catalytic hydroprocessing, heavy ends (asphaltenes) analysis, corrosion, etc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据