4.8 Article

Structural basis of sequence-specific collagen recognition by SPARC

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808452105

关键词

extracellular matrix; X-ray crystallography

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Shriner's Hospital for Children
  3. Wellcome Senior Research Fellow
  4. BBSRC [BB/D524840/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [G0500707] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D524840/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0500707] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein interactions with the collagen triple helix play a critical role in collagen fibril formation, cell adhesion, and signaling. However, structural insight into sequence-specific collagen recognition is limited to an integrin-peptide complex. A GVMGFO motif in fibrillar collagens (0 denotes 4-hydroxyproline) binds 3 unrelated proteins: von Willebrand factor (VWF), discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2), and the extracellular matrix protein SPARC/osteonectin/BM-40. We report the crystal structure at 3.2 angstrom resolution of human SPARC bound to a triple-helical 33-residue peptide harboring the promiscuous GVMGFO motif. SPARC recognizes the GVMGFO motifs of the middle and trailing collagen chains, burying a total of 720 angstrom(2) of solvent-accessible collagen surface. SPARC binding does not distort the canonical triple helix of the collagen peptide. In contrast, a critical loop in SPARC is substantially remodelled upon collagen binding, creating a deep pocket that accommodates the phenylalanine residue of the trailing collagen chain (Phe pocket). This highly restrictive specificity pocket is shared with the collagen-binding integrin I-domains but differs strikingly from the shallow collagen-binding grooves of the platelet receptor glycoprotein VI and microbial adhesins. We speculate that binding of the GVMGFO motif to VWF and DDR2 also results in structural changes and the formation of a Phe pocket.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据