4.8 Article

Distinct roles for IL-13 and IL-4 via IL-13 receptor α1 and the type II IL-4 receptor in asthma pathogenesis

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802465105

关键词

inflammation; cytokines; eosinophils; chemokines; mucus

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [T32 HL007698, P01 HL076383, P01 HL-076383] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI057803] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IL-13 and IL-4 are central T helper 2 (Th2) cytokines in the immune system and potent activators of inflammatory responses and fibrosis during Th2 inflammation. Recent studies using 1/13ra1(-/-) mice have demonstrated a critical role for IL-13 receptor (IL-13R) alpha 1 in allergen-induced airway responses. However, these observations require further attention especially because IL-4 can induce similar lung pathology to IL-13, independent of IL-13, and is still present in the allergic lung. Thus, we hypothesized that IL-13R alpha 1 regulates IL-4-induced responses in the lung. To dissect the role of IL-13R alpha 1 and the type I and 11 lL-4Rs in experimental asthma, we examined lung pathology induced by allergen, IL-4, and IL-13 challenge in 1/13ra1(-/-) mice. We report that IL-13R alpha 1 is essential for baseline IgE production, but Th2 and IgE responses to T cell-dependent antigens are IL-13R alpha 1-independent. Furthermore, we demonstrate that increased airway resistance, mucus, TGF-beta, and eotaxin(s) production, but not cellular infiltration, are critically dependent on IL-13R alpha 1. Surprisingly, our results identify a CCR3- and IL-13R alpha 1-independent pathway for lung eosinophilia. Global expression profiling of lungs from mice stimulated with allergen or IL-4 demonstrated that marker genes of alternatively activated macrophages are differentially regulated by the type I and type 11 IL-4R. Taken together, our data provide a comprehensive mechanistic analysis of the critical role by which IL-13R alpha 1 mediates allergic lung pathology and highlight unforeseen roles for the type 11 IL-4R.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据