4.8 Article

Acid-sensing ion channels interact with and inhibit BKK+ channels

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0712280105

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR024979] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL014388, HL515670, P50 HL061234, P01 HL014388, HL61234] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK054759, DK54759] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are neuronal non-voltage-gated cation channels that are activated when extracellular pH falls. They contribute to sensory function and nociception in the peripheral nervous system, and in the brain they contribute to synaptic plasticity and fear responses. Some of the physiologic consequences of disrupting ASIC genes in mice suggested that ASIC channels might modulate neuronal function by mechanisms in addition to their H+-evoked opening. Within ASIC channel's large extracellular domain, we identified sequence resembling that in scorpion toxins that inhibit K+ channels. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that ASIC channels might inhibit K+ channel function by coexpressing ASICla and the high-conductance Ca2+- and voltage-activated K+ (BK) channel. We found that ASICla associated with BK channels and inhibited their current. Reducing extracellular pH disrupted the association and relieved the inhibition. BK channels, in turn, altered the kinetics of ASICla current. In addition to BK, ASICla inhibited voltage-gated Kv1.3 channels. Other ASIC channels also inhibited BK, although acidosis-dependent relief of inhibition varied. These results reveal a mechanism of ion channel interaction and reciprocal regulation. Finding that a reduced pH activated ASIC1a and relieved BK inhibition suggests that extracellular protons may enhance the activity of channels with opposing effects on membrane voltage. The wide and varied expression patterns of ASICs, BK, and related K+ channels suggest broad opportunities for this signaling system to alter neuronal function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据