4.8 Article

Perception of emotional expressions is independent of face selectivity in monkey inferior temporal cortex

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0800489105

关键词

amygdala; emotion; valence; fMRl

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY017081-02, R01 EY017081, R01 EY017081-03, R01 EY017081-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH067529, R01 MH67529] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to perceive and differentiate facial expressions is vital for social communication. Numerous functional MRI (fMR1) studies in humans have shown enhanced responses to faces with different emotional valence, in both the amygdala and the visual cortex. However, relatively few studies have examined how valence influences neural responses in monkeys, thereby limiting the ability to draw comparisons across species and thus understand the underlying neural mechanisms. Here we tested the effects of macaque facial expressions on neural activation within these two regions using fMR1 in three awake, behaving monkeys. Monkeys maintained central fixation while blocks of different monkey facial expressions were presented. Four different facial expressions were tested: (i) neutral, (it) aggressive (open-mouthed threat), (fil) fearful (fear grin), and (iv) submissive (lip smack). Our results confirmed that both the amygdala and the inferior temporal cortex in monkeys are modulated by facial expressions. As in human fMR1, fearful expressions evoked the greatest response in monkeys-even though fearful expressions are physically dissimilar in humans and macaques. Furthermore, we found that valence effects were not uniformly distributed over the inferior temporal cortex. Surprisingly, these valence maps were independent of two related functional maps: (i) the map of -face-selective regions (faces versus non-face objects) and (it) the map of face-responsive regions (faces versus scrambled images). Thus, the neural mechanisms underlyingface perception and valence perception appear to be distinct.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据