4.8 Article

The Bro1-related protein HD-PTP/PTPN23 is required for endosomal cargo sorting and multivesicular body morphogenesis

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707601105

关键词

Alix; endocytosis; ESCRT

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E019919/1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G0001128, G0501725, G9722026] Funding Source: Medline
  3. BBSRC [BB/E019919/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [G9722026, G0501725, G0001128] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E019919/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [G0501725, G9722026, G0001128] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein Bro1p is required for sorting enclocytic cargo to the lumen of multivesicular bodies (MVBs). The mammalian ortholog of Bro1p is not known; although Alix, a structurally related protein, supports the topologically similar process of virus budding, functional studies have so far failed to identify a role for Alix in MVB formation. To establish whether Alix or similar protein(s) participate in endosomal sorting, we attached a retroviral peptide that binds Alix to a reporter receptor. This chimera was sorted efficiently away from the early endosome to the lumen of late enclocytic compartments. Surprisingly, sorting was not prevented by depleting Alix but instead required the Alix-related protein His domain phosphotyrosine phosphatase (HD-PTP)/His-Domain/Type N23 protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTPN23). Depletion of HD-PTP also reduced transfer of fluid-phase markers and EGF receptor to lysosomes, caused the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins on endosomal compartments and disrupted the morphogenesis of MVBs. Rescue experiments using an RNAi-resistant version of HD-PTP and HD-PTP mutants demonstrated an essential role for the HD-PTP Bro1 domain, with ESCRT-III binding correlating with full biological activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据