4.8 Article

Individual binding pockets of importin-β for FG-nucleoporins have different binding properties and different sensitivities to RanGTP

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802647105

关键词

nuclear import; nuclear pore complex; nuclear transport; scanning probe microscopy; single-molecule force measurement

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. Japan Science and Technology Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Importin-beta mediates protein transport across the nuclear envelope through the nuclear pore complex (NPC) by interacting with components of the NPC, called nucleoporins, and a small G protein, Ran. Although there is accumulated knowledge on the specific interaction between importin-beta and the Phe-Gly (FG) motif in the nucleoporins as well as the effect of RanGTIP on this interaction, the molecular mechanism by which importin-beta shuttles across the nuclear envelope through the NPC is unknown. In this study, we focused on four binding pockets of importin-beta for the FG motifs and characterized the interaction using a single-molecule force-measurement technique with atomic-force microscopy. The results from a series of importin-beta mutants containing amino acid substitutions within the FG-binding pockets demonstrate that the individual FG-binding pockets have different affinities to FG-Nups (Nup62 and Nup153) and different sensitivities to RanGTP; the binding of RanGTP to the amino-terminal domain of importin-beta induces the conformational change of the entire molecule and reduces the affinity of some of the pockets but not others. These heterogeneous characteristics of the multiple FG-binding pockets may play an important role in the behavior of importin-p within the NPC. Single-molecule force measurement using the entire molecule of an NPC from a Xenopus oocyte also implies that the reduction of the affinity by RanGTP really occurs at the nucleoplasmic side of the entire NPC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据