4.8 Article

Imaging the impact on cuprate superconductivity of varying the interatomic distances within individual crystal unit cells

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706795105

关键词

apical oxygen; dopant atoms; out-of-plane influence; superconducting energy gap; supermodulation

资金

  1. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [844115] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  2. Division Of Materials Research [844115] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many theoretical models of high-temperature superconductivity focus only on the doping dependence of the CuO2-plane electronic structure. However, such models are manifestly insufficient to explain the strong variations in superconducting critical temperature, T-c, among cuprates that have identical hole density but are crystallographically different outside of the CuO2 plane. A key challenge, therefore, has been to identify a predominant out-of-plane influence controlling the superconductivity, with much attention focusing on the distance d(A) between the apical oxygen and the planar copper atom. Here we report direct determination of how variations in interatomic distances within individual crystalline unit cells affect the superconducting energy-gap maximum Delta of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+delta. In this material, quasiperiodic variations of unit cell geometry occur in the form of a bulk crystalline supermodulation. Within each supermodulation period, we find approximate to 9 +/- 1% cosinusoidal variation in local Delta that is anticorrelated with the associated d(A) variations. Furthermore, we show that phenomenological consistency would exist between these effects and the random Delta variations found near dopant atoms if the primary effect of the interstitial dopant atom is to displace the apical oxygen so as to diminish d(A) or tilt the CuO5 pyramid. Thus, we reveal a strong, nonrandom out-of-plane effect on cuprate superconductivity at atomic scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据