4.8 Article

Androgen receptor is a tumor suppressor and proliferator in prostate cancer

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0804700105

关键词

androgen deprivation therapy; testosterone; TGF beta 1; metastasis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA122840, CA127300]
  2. George H. Whipple Professorship Endowment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Targeting androgens/androgen receptor (AR) functions via androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the standard treatment for prostate cancer. However, most tumors eventually recur despite ADT. Here we demonstrate that the prostate AIR may function as both a suppressor and a proliferator to suppress or promote prostate cancer metastasis. Results from orthotopically recombining stromal WPMY1 cells with epithelial PC3 prostate cancer cells in mice demonstrated that restoring AIR in epithelial PC3 cells or knockdown of AIR in stromal WPMY1 cells suppressed prostate cancer metastasis. Knockdown of the AIR in epithelial CWR22rv1 prostate cancer cells also resulted in increased cell invasion in vitro and in vivo. Restoring AIR in PC3 cells (PC3-AR9) results in decreased invasion in bone lesion assays and in vivo mouse models. Mice lacking the prostate epithelial AR have increased apoptosis in epithelial luminal cells and increased proliferation in epithelial basal cells. The consequences of these two contrasting results led to the expansion of CK5/CK8-positive intermediate cells, and mice developed larger and more invasive metastatic tumors in lymph nodes and died earlier than wild-type littermates. Mechanistic dissection suggested that androgens/AR might directly or indirectly modulate metastasis-related genes and suppression of TGF beta 1 signals results in the partial inhibition of AR-mediated metastasis. Collectively, our understanding of these opposing roles of prostatic AIR may revolutionize the way we combat prostate cancer, and allow the development of new and better therapies by targeting only the proliferative role of AIR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据