4.8 Article

Non-cell-autonomous control of vascular stem cell fate by a CLE peptide/receptor system

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808444105

关键词

CLV3/ESR-related (CLE); leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase; phloem; procambium; xylem

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture, Science, and Technology, Japan [19060009, 19060010]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [17207004, 18687003]
  3. Program of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19060010, 17207004, 19060009, 18687003, 19060016] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Land plants evolved a long-distance transport system of water and nutrients composed of the xylem and phloem, both of which are generated from the procambium- and cambium-comprising vascular stem cells. However, little is known about the molecular mechanism of cell communication governing xylem-phloem patterning. Here, we show that a dodecapeptide (HEVHypSGHypNPISN; Hyp, 4-hydroxyproline), TDIF (tracheary element differentiation inhibitory factor), is secreted from the phloem and suppresses the differentiation of vascular stem cells into xylem cells through a leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase (LRR-RLK). TDIF binds in vitro specifically to the LRR-RLK, designated TDR (putative TDIF receptor), whose expression is restricted to procambial cells. However, the combined analysis of TDIF with a specific antibody and the expression profiles of the promoters of two genes encoding TDIF revealed that TDIF is synthesized mainly in, and secreted from, the phloem and its neighboring cells. The observation that TDIF is capable of promoting proliferation of procambial cells while suppressing xylem differentiation suggests that this small peptide functions as a phloem-derived, non-cell-autonomous signal that controls stem cell fate in the procambium. Our results indicate that we have discovered a cell communication system governing phloem-xylem cross-talk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据