4.8 Article

Role of the familial Dutch mutation E22Q in the folding and aggregation of the 15-28 fragment of the Alzheimer amyloid-β protein

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0708193105

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; explicit water; familial type; molecular dynamics simulations; replica exchange

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM083001] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyloid fibrils, large ordered aggregates of amyloid beta proteins (A beta), are clinical hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aggregation properties of amyloid beta proteins can be strongly affected by single-point mutations at positions 22 and 23. The Dutch mutation involves a substitution at position 22 (E22Q) and leads to increased deposition rates of the A beta E22Q peptide onto preseeded fibrils. We investigate the effect of the E22Q mutation on two key regions involved in the folding and aggregation of the A beta pepticle through replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations of the 15-28 fragment of the A beta pepticle. The A beta 15-28 pepticle encompasses the 22-28 region that constitutes the most structured part of the A beta peptide (the E22-K28 bend), as well as the central hydrophobic cluster (CHC) (segment 17-21), the primary docking site for A beta monomers depositing onto fibrils. Our simulations show that the 22-28 bend is preserved in the A beta(15-28) pepticle and that the CHC, which is mostly unstructured, interacts with this bend region. The E22Q mutation does not affect the structure of the bend but weakens the interactions between the CHC and the bend. This leads to an increased population of beta-structure in the CHC. Our analysis of the fibril elongation reaction reveals that the CHC adopts a beta-strand conformation in the transition state ensemble, and that the E22Q mutation increases aggregation rates by lowering the barrier for A beta monomer deposition onto a fibril. Thermodynamic signatures of this enhanced fibrillization process from our simulations are in good agreement with experimental observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据