4.8 Article

Paleoindian demography and the extraterrestrial impact hypothesis

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803762105

关键词

comet; Clovis; population decline; radiocarbon; summed probability distribution

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [0502293]
  2. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [756-2007-0577]
  3. Canada Research Chairs Program
  4. Canada Foundation
  5. British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund
  6. Simon Fraser University
  7. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  8. Office Of The Director
  9. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [0502293] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently it has been suggested that one or more large extraterrestrial (ET) objects struck northern North America 12,900 +/- 100 calendar years before present (caIBP) [Firestone RB, et al. (2007) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16016-16021]. This impact is claimed to have triggered the Younger Dryas major cooling event and resulted in the extinction of the North American megafauna. The impact is also claimed to have caused major cultural changes and population decline among the Paleoindians. Here, we report a study in which approximate to 1,500 radiocarbon dates from archaeological sites in Canada and the United States were used to test the hypothesis that the ET resulted in population decline among the Paleoindians. Following recent studies [e.g., Gamble C, Davies W, Pettitt P, Hazelwood L, Richards M (2005) Camb Archaeol J 15:193-223), the summed probability distribution of the calibrated dates was used to identify probable changes in human population size between 15,000 and 9,000 caIBP. Subsequently, potential biases were evaluated by modeling and spatial analysis of the dated occupations. The results of the analyses were not consistent with the predictions of extraterrestrial impact hypothesis. No evidence of a population decline among the Paleoindians at 12,900 +/- 100 calBP was found. Thus, minimally, the study suggests the extraterrestrial impact hypothesis should be amended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据