4.8 Article

Leptin-enhanced neointimal hyperplasia is reduced by mTOR and PI3K inhibitors

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809743105

关键词

metabolic syndrome; vascular disease; neointimal formation; vascular smooth muscle cells

资金

  1. institutional Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award [NHLBI HL007854]
  2. National Institutes of Health postdoctoral fellowship [NHLBI F32HL088815]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the use of the sirolimus (rapamycin) drug-eluting coronary stent, diabetics are at increased risk of developing in-stent restenosis for unclear reasons. Hyperleptinemia, which often coexists with diabetes and metabolic syndrome, is an independent risk factor for progression of coronary artery disease. It has not been determined whether elevated circulating leptin decreases the efficacy of the sirolimus drug-eluting stent in inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia, the process underlying restenosis after stenting. Here we show that leptin activates the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway in primary murine vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) and stimulates VSMC proliferation in a PI3K-dependent fashion. Exogenous leptin, administered at levels comparable to those found in obese humans, promotes neointimal VSMC hyperplasia in a murine femoral artery wire injury model. Leptin significantly increases the dose of the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus that is required for effective inhibition of neointimal formation. Combination therapy with LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor, and sirolimus effectively inhibits leptin-enhanced neointimal hyperplasia. These data show that, in the setting of hyperleptinemia, higher doses of an mTOR inhibitor, or combination therapy with mTOR and PI3K inhibitors, inhibits neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury. These studies may explain the higher rates of restenosis observed in diabetics treated with a sirolimus-eluting coronary stent and suggest a potential novel therapeutic approach for inhibiting in-stent restenosis in such patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据