4.8 Article

Modeling targeted layered containment of an influenza pandemic in the United States

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706849105

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC [G0600719] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0600719B, G0600719] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0600719] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [U01-GM070749, U01 GM070694, U01 GM070708, U01-GM070694, U01 GM070749, U01 GM070698, U01-GM070708, U01-GM070698] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Planning a response to an outbreak of a pandemic strain of influenza is a high public health priority. Three research groups using different individual-based, stochastic simulation models have examined the consequences of intervention strategies chosen in consultation with U.S. public health workers. The first goal is to simulate the effectiveness of a set of potentially feasible intervention strategies. Combinations called targeted layered containment (TLC) of influenza antiviral treatment and prophylaxis and nonpharmaceutical interventions of quarantine, isolation, school closure, community social distancing, and workplace social distancing are considered. The second goal is to examine the robustness of the results to model assumptions. The comparisons focus on a pandemic outbreak in a population similar to that of Chicago, with approximate to 8.6 million people. The simulations suggest that at the expected transmissibility of a pandemic strain, timely implementation of a combination of targeted household antiviral prophylaxis, and social distancing measures could substantially lower the illness attack rate before a highly efficacious vaccine could become available. Timely initiation of measures and school closure play important roles. Because of the current lack of data on which to base such models, further field research is recommended to learn more about the sources of transmission and the effectiveness of social distancing measures in reducing influenza transmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据