4.3 Article

On the λ ratio range of mixed lubrication

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1350650112461867

关键词

Mixed lubrication; elastohydrodynamic lubrication; mixed elastohydrodynamic lubrication; lambda ratio; film thickness ratio; roughness effect; elastohydrodynamic lubrication simulation; elastohydrodynamic lubrication experiment

资金

  1. State key laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, China [0301002109159]
  2. Center for surface Engineering and Tribology at Northwestern University, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mixed lubrication is a mode of fluid lubrication in which both hydrodynamic lubricant film and rough surface asperity contact coexist. Mixed lubrication problems are usually associated with significant surface roughness effect. A common belief is that full-film lubrication occurs when the lambda ratio, defined as average film thickness divided by composite root mean square roughness, is greater than 3.0, while boundary lubrication corresponds to lambda < 0.5-1.0. Mixed lubrication, therefore, is roughly in the range 0.5-1.0 < lambda < 3.0. However, these considerations were established long ago based on early stochastic analyses, which did not adequately consider rough surface asperity interaction and correlation, as well as reduction of asperity heights caused by surface deformation. Recent experimental studies and deterministic numerical simulations suggested that the lambda ratio range of mixed lubrication needs to be re-visited. Actually, when the lambda ratio is greater than 0.6-1.2, little or no asperity contact is found in either experimental results or numerical solutions. If lambda is around 0.05-0.1, there may still be a considerable portion of load, e. g. greater than 10-15%, being supported by lubricant films. It appears that mixed lubrication spans a lambda ratio range roughly from 0.01-0.05 up to 0.6-1.2, according to the numerical simulation results presented in this article. This estimated range is in a reasonably good agreement with experimental observations found in the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据