4.3 Article

Experimental research on noise emanating from concrete box-girder bridges on intercity railway lines

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0954409713503459

关键词

Concrete box-girder; rail transit; high-speed railway; field experiment; noise; vibration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51378429, 51308469]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China [NCET-10-0701]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (the 863 Program) [2011AA11A103]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110184110020]
  5. Program for Yanghua Star of SWJTU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simply supported pre-stressed concrete box-girder bridges are the most common bridge type found on high-speed railway and urban rail transit lines in China. A field experiment has been conducted on the Pixian Viaduct of the Chengdu-Dujiangyan Intercity Railway, where two kinds of simply supported pre-stressed concrete box-girder bridges with a standard span of 32m are used, one single track and the other double track. Characteristics of the noise underneath the box-girder, far from the bridge, and near the bridge gap were measured and analyzed in the time and frequency domains during high-speed train passage, as was the vibration of the box-girder's bottom plate. The variations of noise with distance and train speed at locations 1.5 and 9m above ground level were measured and fitted using mathematical formulae. A simplified formula to predict near-field bridge-borne noise was proposed and verified. The peak bridge-borne noise frequency and its tonal characteristic at 50 and 63Hz for the double-track and single-track box-girders, respectively, were interpreted in terms of bridge vibration and sound radiation efficiency, respectively. The vibration/noise transfer function and coherence were evaluated, showing that vibration resonance is more significant than acoustic coincidence and that the former is more important in terms of noise reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据