4.4 Article

Design of non-traditional dynamic vibration absorber for damped linear structures

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0954406213481422

关键词

Dynamic vibration absorber; damped structure; dual criterion; analytical solutions; non-traditional; equivalent undamped structure

资金

  1. Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Voigt-type of dynamic vibration absorber is a classical model and has attracted considerable attention in many years because of its simple design, high reliability and useful applications in the fields of civil and mechanical engineering. Recently, a non-traditional type of dynamic vibration absorber was proposed. Unlike the traditional damped absorber configuration, the non-traditional absorber has a linear viscous damper connecting the absorber mass directly to the ground instead of the main mass. There have been some studies on the design of the non-traditional dynamic vibration absorber in the case of undamped primary structures. Those studies have shown that the non-traditional dynamic vibration absorber has better performance than the traditional dynamic vibration absorber. However, when damping is present at the primary system, there are very few studies on the design of non-traditional dynamic vibration absorber. This article presents a simple approach to determine the approximate analytical solutions for the H optimization of the non-traditional dynamic vibration absorber attached to the damped primary structure subjected to force excitation. The main idea of the study is based on the dual criterion suggested by Anh in order to replace approximately the original damped structure by an equivalent undamped structure. Then the approximate analytical solution of dynamic vibration absorber's parameters is given by using known results for undamped structure obtained. The comparisons have been done to verify the effectiveness of the obtained results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据