4.7 Article

Endoplasmic reticulum stress induces ligand-independent TNFR1-mediated necroptosis in L929 cells

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2014.548

关键词

-

资金

  1. Belgian grants (Interuniversity Attraction Poles) [IAP 7/32]
  2. Research Foundation Flanders [G.0875.11, G.0973.11, G.0A45.12N, G.0787.13N, G.0172.12N]
  3. Flemish grants (Methusalem grant) [BOF09/01M00709]
  4. Ghent University (MRP)
  5. Ghent University (GROUP-ID consortium)
  6. Foundation against Cancer [F94, 2010-162]
  7. VIB
  8. Science Foundation Ireland [06/RFP/BIC002, 05/IN3/B851]
  9. Health Research Board [HRA_HSR/2010/24]
  10. Thomas Crawford Hayes scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-induced cellular dysfunction and death is associated with several human diseases. It has been widely reported that ER stress kills through activation of the intrinsic mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Here we demonstrate that ER stress can also induce necroptosis, an receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1)/RIPK3/mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL)-dependent form of necrosis. Remarkably, we observed that necroptosis induced by various ER stressors in L929 cells is dependent on tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1), but occurs independently of autocrine TNF or lymphotoxin a production. Moreover, we found that repression of either TNFR1, RIPK1 or MLKL did not protect the cells from death but instead allowed a switch to ER stress-induced apoptosis. Interestingly, while caspase inhibition was sufficient to protect TNFR1- or MLKL-deficient cells from death, rescue of the RIPK1-deficient cells additionally required RIPK3 depletion, indicating a switch back to RIPK3-dependent necroptosis in caspase-inhibited conditions. The finding that ER stress also induces necroptosis may open new therapeutic opportunities for the treatment of pathologies resulting from unresolved ER stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据