4.5 Article

Energy-aware resource service scheduling based on utility evaluation in cloud manufacturing system

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0954405413492966

关键词

Cloud manufacturing; resources service scheduling; utility evaluation; system-centered scheduling; energy aware

资金

  1. NSFC [51005012, 61074144]
  2. National Key Technology Research and Development Program [2011BA K16B03]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to realize the manufacturing resource sharing and optimal allocation, many advanced manufacturing modes and technologies have been proposed and researched, but few works have been emphasized on resource service and capability transaction and scheduling management. With these conditions, in this article, the concept of cloud manufacturing mode is first briefly introduced, and a general cloud manufacturing resource service scheduling model is established. Then, the comprehensive utility models, which consider energy consumption, cost, and risk for the three sides (i.e. provider, consumer, and operator), are established in the resource service scheduling process in cloud manufacturing system. Four kinds of resource service scheduling modes, which are provider centered, consumer centered, operator centered, and system centered, are studied. These modes are based on the utility models that are investigated, as well as the system-centered cooperative scheduling method that is designed with risk-sharing strategy. The experimental results show that the system-centered scheduling method has the highest potential for realizing the aim of cloud manufacturing, and the system-centered cooperative scheduling method is rational to obtain the higher maximal utilities of the whole system and the three key users at the same time. It promotes the higher efficiency and utility, a higher rate of sharing, green and on-demand use of decentralized manufacturing resources and capability services in cloud manufacturing systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据