4.6 Article

Identifying modes of occurrence of mercury in coal by temperature programmed pyrolysis

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 2763-2769

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.108

关键词

Coal; Hg; Pyrolysis

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2009AA05Z305]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50721140649, 50721005]
  3. China Institute at the University of Alberta through joint research laboratory initiatives with the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST)
  4. [NCET-08-0227]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the modes of occurrence of mercury in coal provides information needed to evaluate effectiveness of mercury emission control by pretreatment of coal prior to coal combustion. Two coals of different rank, lignite, and bituminous coal, were investigated to identify the modes of occurrence of mercury in coal by density separation followed by acid extraction procedure and temperature programmed pyrolysis. The bituminous coal was divided into five density fraction between <1.4 and >1.8 g/cm(3) by separation in a heavy-liquid mixture. The density-fractionated fractions were extracted by HNO3 solution. The treated samples and the lignite were pyrolyzed at a ramp rate of 1 degrees C/min from room temperature to 660 degrees C to investigate the mercury release behavior during temperature programmed pyrolysis of coal. The results showed that each mode of occurrence of mercury has its characteristic temperature range for mercury release: Hg-0 at <150 degrees C, HgCl2/organic-bound Hg at 150-250 degrees C, HgS/silicate-bound Hg at 250-400 degrees C, and pyrite-bound Hg at 400-600 degrees C. It is inferred that HNO3 extraction and density separation are effective for the removal of pyrite-bound Hg and then the coal can be pyrolyzed at 400 degrees C to remove mercury in other forms. (C) 2010 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据