4.6 Article

Experimental study of unsteady flame structures of an oscillating swirl flame in a gas turbine model combustor

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 2925-2932

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2008.05.086

关键词

Gas turbine combustion; Vortex breakdown; Simultaneous PIV and OH-PLIF; Thermoacoustic oscillation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Velocity fields and flame structures of a partially premixed swirl flame in a gas turbine model combustor are measured in axial and transverse sections using simultaneous (Stereo-)PIV and OH-PLIF. The flame, operated under atmospheric pressure with air and methane at it thermal power of 10.3 kW and it global equivalence ratio of phi=0.75, features thermoacoustic oscillations at a frequency f approximate to 295 Hz. The averaged flow field with inner and outer recirculation zones is typical of swirl-stabilized flames, and the instantaneous measurements show the presence of a helical vortex (PVC) located in the inner shear layer. The PVC, which rotates with a different frequency than the thermoacoustic oscillation, leads to an enhanced mixing of burned and unburned gas and thus to stabilization of the flame. Two distinct large-scale structures of velocity and OH are found in the transverse cross-sections. The first type is characterized by a roughly annular region of inflowing unburned gas and distinct inner and outer recirculation zones. In the second type, the region of positive axial velocity forms a spiral, and the recirculation zone consists of an inner region that is connected to the outer parts by a narrow curved zone along the spiral arm. Whereas the first type is a typical scenario of vortex breakdown with a PVC, the transient spiral recirculation zone observed here has, to our knowledge, not yet been reported. A phase-resolved analysis shows that the annular form correlates with low, and the spiral form with high rates of global heat release. (C) 2009 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据