4.6 Article

Hydrogen-nitrous oxide delay times: Shock tube experimental study and kinetic modelling

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 359-366

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2008.06.171

关键词

Hydrogen; Nitrous oxide; Reflected shock wave; Delay times; Kinetic modelling

资金

  1. French Ministere de l'Education Nationale
  2. de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen-nitrous oxide mixtures have been studied for decades. In addition to their fundamental interest, they might play an important role in semi-conductor industry safety. Indeed, in silane-nitrous oxide mixtures, widely used in this industry, the sitane molecule readily decomposes into molecular hydrogen which can react violently with nitrous oxide. Despite numerous shock tube studies on H(2)-N(2)O delay times, the pressure effect has never been addressed. The present work aims at studying this effect and at developing a detailed kinetic mechanism able to accurately reproduce experimental delay time data. Delay times of H(2)-N(2)O-Ar mixtures have been measured behind reflected shock waves in the 1300-2000 K temperature range and at a pressure around 300 kPa. Mixtures equivalence ratios ranged between 0.5 and 2, and the dilution was 98 and 99 mol% Ar. The present results and those from a previous study carried out in our institute show, first that, in the studied conditions, the equivalence ratio has no influence on delay times, and second, that the pressure increase drastically reduces the delay times. A kinetic model has been constructed from previously published mechanisms and tested against the present data with a mean error of 29%. Moreover, other delay time data from the literature for H(2)-O(2)-Ar, NH(3)-Ar and H(2)-N(2)O-Ar mixtures are also correctly reproduced as well as macroscopic parameters such as reduced activation energies. (C) 2009 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据