4.0 Article

PRND 3′UTR polymorphism may be associated with behavioral disturbances in Alzheimer disease

期刊

PRION
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 73-80

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/pri.6.1.18428

关键词

Alzheimer disease; mild cognitive impairment; behavioral symptoms; APOE; CYP46; PRNP; PRND; polymorphisms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The etiology of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) is complex, including putative biological, psychological, social and environmental factors. Recent years have witnessed accumulation of data on the association between genetic factors and behavioral abnormalities in Alzheimer disease (AD). In this research paper, our aim was to evaluate the association between the APOE, CYP46, PRNP and PRND genes and the profile of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Polish subjects with AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We studied 99 patients with AD and 48 subjects with MCI. The presence and profile of BPSD were evaluated at baseline and prospectively with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Patients were dichotomized into those having ever experienced a particular symptom and those who did not over the whole disease period. Genotyping was performed using previously described standard protocols. The prevalence of comorbid behavioral symptoms and the overall level of behavioral burden were significantly greater in AD compared with the MCI group. In AD patients, carrier status of the T allele of the 3' UTR (untranslated region) PRND polymorphism was associated with an increased cumulative behavioral load and an elevated risk for delusions, anxiety, agitation/aggression, apathy and irritability/emotional ability. Among MCI subjects, APOE epsilon 4 carriers demonstrated a reduced risk for nighttime behavior change. No other statistically significant genotype- phenotype correlations were observed, including the APOE, CYP46 and PRNP genes. A precise estimation of the exact significance of particular polymorphisms in BPSD etiology requires future studies on large populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据